Выберите тематику

Журналы / Электронные журналы

Книги / Электронные книги

Станисавлъевич Е., Николич Т., Радунович В. Анализ отношения учащихся к внедрению эксперимента в процесс преподавания биологии



Страницы: 43–49

 

Авторы:

Е. Станисавлъевич,

доктор биологических наук, профессор,

Т. Николич,

профессор биологии,

В. Радунович,

профессор биологии,

биологический факультет Белградского университета,

Республика Сербия

е-mail: Jelena.Stanisavljevic@bio.bg.ac.rs

 

Ключевые слова: эксперимент, методы практической и лабораторной работы, мотивация учащихся.

 

Аннотация. В статье описывается влияние эксперимента на формирование мотивационных процессов и установок учащихся, а также представлены мнения самих детей о внедрении эксперимента в процесс преподавания биологии.

 

 

ОПИСАНИЕ НА АНГЛИЙСКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ:

 

The analysis of the attitude of students to the implementation of the process in the teaching of biology

 

Authors:

E. Stanisavljevich,

Dr.Sci.Biol., professor,

T. Nikolic,

professor of biology,

V. Radunovich,

professor of biology,

biological faculty of the Belgrad university,

Republic Serbia

е-mail: Jelena.Stanisavljevic@bio.bg.ac.rs

 

Annotation. The article describes the impact of the experiment on the formation of motivational processes and attitudes of pupils and the views of children themselves on the implementation of the experiment in the teaching of biology.

 

Keywords: experiment, methods of the practical and laboratory work, motivation of students.

 



Литература

1.         Abell, S. K.(2007): Research on science teacher learning. In: Abell S. K. & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 1105 – 1149.

2.         Avraamidou, L., Zembal – Saul, C. (2005): Giving priority to evidence in science teaching: A first – year elementary teacher’s specialized practices and knowledge, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42: 965 – 986.

3.         Almeida, P., Fonseca, H.M.A.C., Castro, G. (2010): Laboratory work and fieldwork in biology: promoting students questioning competence. ERIDOB Conference, Book of abstracts, Universidade do Minho - Braga – Portugal, p.93.

4.         Balci, S., Cakiroglu, J., Tekkaya, C. (2006): Engagement, exploration, extension, and evaluation (5E) learning cycle and conceptual change text as learning tools. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34: 199 – 203.

5.         Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S., Mewborn, D. (2001): Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers' mathematical knowledge. In: Richardson, V. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.), New York: Macmillan.

6.         Банђур, В., Поткоњак, Н. (2002). Истраживање у школи, Учитељски факултет, Ужице, 238.

7.         Klahr, D., Li, J. (2005): Cognitive research and elementary science instruction: From the laboratory, to the classroom, and back. Journal of Science Education and Technologu, 14: 217 – 238.

8.         Mendelovici, R., Nussinowitz, R. (2002): Biomind, an alternative for the practical part of curriculum for biology of five units for matriculations. Jerusalem, Israel: The Center for Science Education, The Hebrew University. (in Hebrew).

9.         Sanchez, G., Valcarcel, M.V. (1999): Science teachers’ views and practices in planning for teaching, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (4): 493 – 513.

10.     Станисављевић, Ј., Ђурашевић, С. (2011): Школски огледи и вежбе у настави биологије, практикум са радном свеском. Београд: Универзитет у Београду-Биолошки факултет, 1–109.

11.     Станисављевић, Ј., Радоњић, С. (2009): Методика наставе биологије, Београд: Биолошки факултет Универзитета у Београду, 1–280.

12.     Steffe, L. P., Thompson, P. W. (2000): Teaching Experiment Methodology: Underlying Principles and Essential Elements. In: Handbook of Research in Mathematics and Science Education. R. Lesh and A. E. Kelly (Eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 267 – 307.

13.     Shmaefsky, B. R. (2005): MOS: The Critical Elements of Doing Effective Classroom Demonstrations, Journal of College Science Teaching; 35 (3): 44 – 45.

14.     Scott, P. H., Asoko, H., Leach, J. (2007): Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. In S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 31 – 56.

15.     Tiberghien, A., Veillard, L., Le Maréchal, J-F., Buty, C., Millar, R. (2001): An analysis of labwork tasks used in science teaching at upper secondary school and university levels in several European countrises, Science Education, 85(5): 483 – 508.

16.     Hutchings, P., Shulman, L. (1999): The sclorarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments, Change, 31(5): 10 – 15.

17.     Cavanagh, S. (2008): Labs at Elementary Level Help Bring Science Alive, Education Week, 27(39): 1–10.

18.     Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M. (2008): Beyond the scientific method: Model – based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations, Science Education, 92(5): 941 – 967.

 


Яндекс.Метрика